It's a crying shame cause, reading Burns synopsis of the screenplay plot, it does have possibilities. (Like that they are using a real-life Cold War incident as the basis.)
But Cruise isn't Napoleon Solo, no matter what.
I have no clue about the actor cast as Illya. Not familiar with him at all.
But of course the "powers-that-be" might not even keep the Burns screenplay either. Who the hell knows at this point?
P.S.: Here's an article on the actual incident being referenced in the screenplay: Palomares_B-52_crash
But Cruise isn't Napoleon Solo, no matter what.
I have no clue about the actor cast as Illya. Not familiar with him at all.
But of course the "powers-that-be" might not even keep the Burns screenplay either. Who the hell knows at this point?
P.S.: Here's an article on the actual incident being referenced in the screenplay: Palomares_B-52_crash
(no subject)
Date: 2013-04-26 06:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-04-26 07:03 pm (UTC)Whereas with a cell, you can virtually contact anyone immediately. So direct access; no waiting; no intermediary; no special frequency.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-04-26 09:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-04-26 09:51 pm (UTC)In any case, no way Cruise would be taking the second lead. So the one listing him as IK was likely off and it's the only one that suggested that scenario.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-04-26 10:00 pm (UTC)I still can't watch the Bourne Identity and relate it to the book. It's good, it just isn't BI. MFU will be like that if it's well done. It won't be OUR MFU, no matter who's in the title roles.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-04-27 12:57 am (UTC)Can't repeat enough how much I agree with you about the casting. Ugh.