carabele: (Animated Napoleon)
[personal profile] carabele
It's a crying shame cause, reading Burns synopsis of the screenplay plot, it does have possibilities. (Like that they are using a real-life Cold War incident as the basis.)

But Cruise isn't Napoleon Solo, no matter what.

I have no clue about the actor cast as Illya. Not familiar with him at all.

But of course the "powers-that-be" might not even keep the Burns screenplay either. Who the hell knows at this point?

P.S.: Here's an article on the actual incident being referenced in the screenplay: Palomares_B-52_crash

(no subject)

Date: 2013-04-26 09:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carabele.livejournal.com
There was an article saying that the movie was moving forward at full production schedule now and that notes Cruise as NS and Mammer as IK. Will see if I can locate it again.

In any case, no way Cruise would be taking the second lead. So the one listing him as IK was likely off and it's the only one that suggested that scenario.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-04-26 10:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glennagirl.livejournal.com
A new movie was never going to be an image of what we see in the series. I just hope they make a good movie that people can relate to. Reinventing something that is 50 years old is just like starting from scratch.
I still can't watch the Bourne Identity and relate it to the book. It's good, it just isn't BI. MFU will be like that if it's well done. It won't be OUR MFU, no matter who's in the title roles.

December 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930 31  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags